Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 2448 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 9% better in Battlefield V than FX-8350 - 227 vs 209 FPS
- Up to 57% cheaper than FX-8350 - $80.0 vs $185.0
- Up to 61% better value when playing Battlefield V than FX-8350 - $0.35 vs $0.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
209
92.07048458149781%
Value, $/FPS
$0.89/FPS
39.32584269662921%
Price, $
$185
43%
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360491 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
227
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$80
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360492 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Vishera | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |