Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 3626 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 51% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X - $185.0 vs $380.99
- Up to 41% better value when playing Valheim than Ryzen 9 7900X - $0.97 vs $1.65 per FPS
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 125 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 22% better in Valheim than FX-8350 - 231 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
190
82.25108225108225%
Value, $/FPS
$0.97/FPS
100%
Price, $
$185
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349035 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
231
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.65/FPS
58.78787878787879%
Price, $
$380.99
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for $380.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349035 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-8350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Vishera | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 170 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |