Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 3 1200 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400F is 1008 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen 3 1200.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 4% better in Overwatch 2 than Ryzen 3 1200 - 350 vs 335 FPS
- Up to 72% cheaper than Ryzen 3 1200 - $112.53 vs $395.0
- Up to 73% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Ryzen 3 1200 - $0.32 vs $1.18 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1200 - 12 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
335
95.71428571428572%
Value, $/FPS
$1.18/FPS
27.11864406779661%
Price, $
$395
28%
Buy for $395 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348913 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
350
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$112.53
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $112.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348913 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Single-Core
984
68.42837273991655%
Multi-Core
2834
49.27838636758825%
AMD Ryzen 3 1200 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |