Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms the more expensive Core i5-3470 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 1300X is 1882 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-3470.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Performs up to 6% better in No Man's Sky than Core i5-3470 - 169 vs 160 FPS
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i5-3470 - $65.23 vs $69.0
- Up to 9% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i5-3470 - $0.39 vs $0.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3470 - 65 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3470
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1300X doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
169
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$65.23
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $65.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354110 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
160
94.67455621301775%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
90.69767441860466%
Price, $
$69
94%
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354109 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
622
56.70009115770283%
Multi-Core
1840
58.283180234399744%
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X | vs | Intel Core i5-3470 |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |