Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 1300X is 205 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-7400T - 156 vs 155 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400T
- Up to 3% cheaper than Ryzen 3 1300X - $63.5 vs $65.23
- Up to 2% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Ryzen 3 1300X - $0.41 vs $0.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
156
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
97.61904761904762%
Price, $
$65.23
97%
FPS Winner
Buy for $65.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354091 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
155
99.35897435897436%
Value, $/FPS
$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $63.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354091 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
1017
92.7073837739289%
Multi-Core
2806
88.88184985745961%
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X | vs | Intel Core i5-7400T |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |