Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3770S on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 1300X is 1915 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3770S.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Performs up to 3% better in World of Tanks than Core i7-3770S - 523 vs 510 FPS
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i7-3770S - $65.23 vs $75.0
- Up to 20% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i7-3770S - $0.12 vs $0.15 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770S
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1300X doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
523
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$65.23
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $65.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354092 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
510
97.51434034416826%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
80%
Price, $
$75
86%
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354090 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
669
60.984503190519604%
Multi-Core
2234
70.7633829585049%
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X | vs | Intel Core i7-3770S |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |