Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms the cheaper FX-8150 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 1300X is 2115 days newer than the cheaper FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Performs up to 5% better in God of War than FX-8150 - 170 vs 162 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing God of War than FX-8150 - $0.38 vs $0.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Up to 2% cheaper than Ryzen 3 1300X - $64.03 vs $65.23
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 8 vs 4 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
170
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$65.23
98%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $65.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354145 minutes ago
Buy for $64.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354144 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |