Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100T outperforms the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100T is 803 days newer than the cheaper Xeon E5-1650 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Performs up to 1% better in Rust than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 186 vs 185 FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 35 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i3-9100T - $94.05 vs $99.0
- Up to 4% better value when playing Rust than Core i3-9100T - $0.51 vs $0.53 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 12 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280444 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
185
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$94.05
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $94.05 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280444 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100T | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |