Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400 is 261 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i5-9400 - $80.0 vs $160.91
- Up to 45% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-9400 - $0.16 vs $0.29 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Performs up to 8% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen 3 3200G - 556 vs 515 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 6 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
515
92.62589928057554%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, $
$80
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360456 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
556
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.29/FPS
55.17241379310346%
Price, $
$160.91
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for $160.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 360456 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
76.01156069364163%
Multi-Core
3013
62.83628779979145%
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i5-9400 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |