Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6800K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6800K is 1132 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i7-6800K - $80.0 vs $108.0
- Up to 24% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-6800K - $0.79 vs $1.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 3% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 3 3200G - 104 vs 101 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 12 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
101
97.11538461538461%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
100%
Price, $
$80
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358070 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
104
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.04/FPS
75.96153846153845%
Price, $
$108
74%
FPS Winner
Buy for $108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 358070 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1052
85.94771241830065%
Multi-Core
3013
53.223812047341454%
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Picasso | Codename | Broadwell-E |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |