Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 742 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $155.0 vs $244.77
- Up to 33% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-10900F - $1.21 vs $1.8 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 6% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Ryzen 5 2600 - 136 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 20 vs 12 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
128
94.11764705882352%
Value, $/FPS
$1.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$155
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $155 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349871 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.8/FPS
67.22222222222221%
Price, $
$244.77
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349870 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1152
68.73508353221956%
Multi-Core
4841
57.453121291241395%
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |