Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 2200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 808 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 25% better in War Thunder than Ryzen 3 2200G - 196 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $130.0 vs $244.77
- Up to 34% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-10900F - $0.83 vs $1.25 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
196
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.25/FPS
66.39999999999999%
Price, $
$244.77
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349103 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
157
80.10204081632652%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$130
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $130 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349103 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Single-Core
997
59.48687350835322%
Multi-Core
2858
33.918822691668645%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |