Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F and the cheaper Core i5-10600K have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600K - 20 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Up to 41% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $143.72 vs $244.77
- Up to 41% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i9-10900F - $0.98 vs $1.67 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
147
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.67/FPS
58.68263473053892%
Price, $
$244.77
58%
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349155 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
147
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.98/FPS
100%
Price, $
$143.72
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $143.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Single-Core
1658
98.92601431980907%
Multi-Core
6838
81.15357227628768%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
20 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |