Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 1765 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 3% better in Elden Ring than Core i7-6700 - 124 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700 - 20 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $150.0 vs $244.77
- Up to 37% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-10900F - $1.25 vs $1.97 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
124
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.97/FPS
63.45177664974619%
Price, $
$244.77
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for $244.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349161 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
120
96.7741935483871%
Value, $/FPS
$1.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$150
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349161 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1293
77.14797136038186%
Multi-Core
4140
49.13363399003086%
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |