Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6800K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6800K is 1132 days older than the more expensive Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen 5 3400G - 536 vs 524 FPS
- Up to 18% cheaper than Ryzen 5 3400G - $108.0 vs $132.0
- Up to 20% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen 5 3400G - $0.2 vs $0.25 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3400G - 12 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
524
97.76119402985076%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
80%
Price, $
$132
81%
Buy for $132 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359676 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
536
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$108
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $108 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359676 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1128
92.15686274509804%
Multi-Core
3619
63.928634516869806%
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Picasso | Codename | Broadwell-E |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |