Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 1700 is 1591 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Performs up to 55% better in Diablo IV than FX-8350 - 150 vs 97 FPS
- Up to 32% better value when playing Diablo IV than FX-8350 - $1.3 vs $1.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 5% cheaper than Ryzen 7 1700 - $185.0 vs $195.0
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
150
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$195
94%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $195 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353892 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
97
64.66666666666666%
Value, $/FPS
$1.91/FPS
68.06282722513089%
Price, $
$185
100%
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353891 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Mar 2nd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | FX |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |