Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-8700 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-8700 is 144 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i7-8700 - $788.88 vs $869.99
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-8700 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700
- Performs up to 14% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 379 vs 332 FPS
- Up to 3% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $2.3 vs $2.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
332
87%
Value, $/FPS
$2.38/FPS
96%
Price, $
$788.88
100%
Buy for $788.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280531 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
FPS
379
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$869.99
90%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $869.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280530 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i7-8700 |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2018 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |