Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900X is 800 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900X - 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 14% better in War Thunder than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 190 vs 166 FPS
- Up to 22% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $615.0 vs $788.88
- Up to 32% better value when playing War Thunder than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $3.24 vs $4.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 165 vs 180 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
166
87.36842105263159%
Value, $/FPS
$4.75/FPS
68.21052631578948%
Price, $
$788.88
77%
Buy for $788.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354096 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
190
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$615
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $615 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354096 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
74.30203045685279%
Multi-Core
7539
80.45032547220147%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Whitehaven | Codename | Cascade Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |