Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6950X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6950X is 436 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6950X - 32 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6950X
- Performs up to 1% better in Overwatch 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 347 vs 344 FPS
- Up to 17% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $651.07 vs $788.88
- Up to 18% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $1.88 vs $2.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 140 vs 180 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
344
99%
Value, $/FPS
$2.29/FPS
82%
Price, $
$788.88
82%
Buy for $788.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280580 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
347
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.88/FPS
100%
Price, $
$651.07
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $651.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280580 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i7-6950X |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Broadwell-E |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |