Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 800 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - $788.88 vs $827.21
- Up to 2% better value when playing Apex Legends than Core i9-10920X - $2.84 vs $2.9 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10920X - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 3% better in Apex Legends than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 285 vs 278 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 165 vs 180 Watts
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
278
97.54385964912281%
Value, $/FPS
$2.84/FPS
100%
Price, $
$788.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $788.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354128 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
285
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.9/FPS
97.93103448275862%
Price, $
$827.21
95%
FPS Winner
Buy for $827.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 354128 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
69.91044776119402%
Multi-Core
7539
66.42876024319322%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i9-10920X |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Whitehaven | Codename | Cascade Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |