Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-9900KS outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 390 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 1% cheaper than Core i9-9900KS - $530.0 vs $535.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 3% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 175 vs 170 FPS
- Up to 2% better value when playing Forza Horizon 5 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $3.06 vs $3.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 127 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for $530 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280306 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
FPS
175
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$535
99%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $535 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280306 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KS |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 127 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |