Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900X is 16 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 4% cheaper than Core i9-9900X - $530.0 vs $550.0
- Up to 2% better value when playing Resident Evil 4 than Core i9-9900X - $3.01 vs $3.06 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900X - 24 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Performs up to 2% better in Resident Evil 4 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 180 vs 176 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 165 vs 180 Watts
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
176
97.77777777777777%
Value, $/FPS
$3.01/FPS
100%
Price, $
$530
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $530 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353914 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
180
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.06/FPS
98.36601307189542%
Price, $
$550
96%
FPS Winner
Buy for $550 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 353914 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
1274
85.61827956989248%
Multi-Core
7454
78.33123160992014%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i9-9900X |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 165 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |