Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 1455 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 0% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - $530.0 vs $531.86
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 24% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 214 vs 172 FPS
- Up to 19% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $2.49 vs $3.08 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 32 vs 24 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $530 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280299 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
214
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$531.86
99%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $531.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 280299 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 24 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |