Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X vs Ryzen 9 7900X3D: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

3.5 GHz | 12-core

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Logo
AMD YD292XA8AFWOF Ryzen Threadripper 2920X (12-Core/24-Thread) Processor 4.3 GHz Max Boost 38MB Cache

Buy for $530 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 280307 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D

4.4 GHz | 12-core

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D Logo
AMD Ryzen™ 9 7900X3D 12-Core, 24-Thread Desktop Processor

Buy for $406.02 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 280306 minutes ago

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

3.5 GHz | 12-core

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Logo
AMD YD292XA8AFWOF Ryzen Threadripper 2920X (12-Core/24-Thread) Processor 4.3 GHz Max Boost 38MB Cache

Buy for $530 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 280307 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D

4.4 GHz | 12-core

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D Logo
AMD Ryzen™ 9 7900X3D 12-Core, 24-Thread Desktop Processor

Buy for $406.02 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 280306 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 1554 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.

Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D

  • Performs up to 9% better in Forza Horizon 5 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 186 vs 170 FPS
  • Up to 23% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $406.02 vs $530.0
  • Up to 30% better value when playing Forza Horizon 5 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - $2.18 vs $3.12 per FPS
  • Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 120 vs 180 Watts
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
This is a free version of Forza Horizon 5.

Forza Horizon 5

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Max

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Logo
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018


FPS

170

91%

Value, $/FPS

$3.12/FPS

69%

Price, $

$530

76%

AMD YD292XA8AFWOF Ryzen Threadripper 2920X (12-Core/24-Thread) Processor 4.3 GHz Max Boost 38MB Cache

Buy for $530 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 280307 minutes ago

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D Logo
Ryzen 9 7900X3D

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023


FPS

186

100%

Value, $/FPS

$2.18/FPS

100%

Price, $

$406.02

100%

FPS and Value Winner

AMD Ryzen™ 9 7900X3D 12-Core, 24-Thread Desktop Processor

Buy for $406.02 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 280306 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Max

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Logo
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D Logo
Ryzen 9 7900X3D

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Logo
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018


Single-Core

1274

45%

Multi-Core

7454

42%

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D Logo
Ryzen 9 7900X3D

Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023


Single-Core

2822

100%

Multi-Core

17479

100%

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X Logo

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X

vs
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D Logo

AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D

Oct 3rd, 2018Release Date
Jan 4th, 2023
Ryzen ThreadripperCollectionRyzen 9
ColfaxCodenameRaphael
AMD Socket SP3r2SocketAMD Socket AM5
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
12Cores12
24Threads24
3.5 GHzBase Clock Speed
4.4 GHz
4.3 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
5.6 GHz
180 WTDP
120 W
12 nmProcess Size
5 nm
35.0xMultiplier
44.0x
NoneIntegrated Graphics
Radeon Graphics
YesOverclockableYes

Builds Using Ryzen Threadripper 2920X or Ryzen 9 7900X3D

Forza Horizon 5, 1920 x 1080, Max

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.