Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 1864 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i5-9400F - $46.41 vs $112.0
- Up to 52% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Core i5-9400F - $0.38 vs $0.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 16% better in Far Cry 3 than Celeron G1820 - 141 vs 122 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 6 vs 2 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
122
86.52482269503547%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349153 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
141
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
48.10126582278481%
Price, $
$112
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for $112 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
35.63134978229318%
Multi-Core
825
17.06661150186181%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |