Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 1129 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 34% cheaper than Core i3-7100 - $46.41 vs $70.0
- Up to 25% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Core i3-7100 - $0.38 vs $0.51 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 12% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Celeron G1820 - 138 vs 123 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Celeron G1820 - 51 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
123
89.13043478260869%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349392 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
138
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
74.50980392156863%
Price, $
$70
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349393 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
39.37449879711307%
Multi-Core
825
33.81147540983606%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |