Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3450 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-3450 is 581 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i5-3450 - $46.41 vs $69.0
- Up to 32% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-3450 - $0.39 vs $0.57 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-3450 - 53 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Performs up to 2% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G1820 - 120 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
118
98.33333333333333%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349512 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
120
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.57/FPS
68.42105263157896%
Price, $
$69
67%
FPS Winner
Buy for $69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349511 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
81.4262023217247%
Multi-Core
825
46.322290847838296%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i5-3450 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 77 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |