Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-6600 is 578 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i5-6600 - $46.41 vs $74.0
- Up to 32% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-6600 - $0.17 vs $0.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600
- Performs up to 6% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Celeron G1820 - 291 vs 274 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
274
94.15807560137456%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349401 minutes ago
Buy for $74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349402 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
38.18040435458787%
Multi-Core
825
23.22635135135135%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i5-6600 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |