Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770S outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-3770S is 581 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i7-3770S - $46.41 vs $75.0
- Up to 37% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i7-3770S - $0.17 vs $0.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770S - 53 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770S
- Performs up to 1% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Celeron G1820 - 278 vs 274 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
274
98.56115107913669%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349515 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
278
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
62.96296296296296%
Price, $
$75
61%
FPS Winner
Buy for $75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349514 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
73.39312406576981%
Multi-Core
825
36.92927484333035%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770S |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | No |