Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600 is 2342 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i5-10600 - $46.41 vs $299.95
- Up to 83% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-10600 - $0.3 vs $1.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600
- Performs up to 10% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G1820 - 170 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 12 vs 2 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
155
91.17647058823529%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349515 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
170
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.76/FPS
17.045454545454543%
Price, $
$299.95
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $299.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349516 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
31.09563014566181%
Multi-Core
825
13.360323886639677%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |