Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 2342 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $46.41 vs $225.99
- Up to 78% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-10700F - $0.24 vs $1.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 7% better in Valheim than Celeron G1820 - 204 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 16 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
190
93.13725490196079%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349043 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
204
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.11/FPS
21.62162162162162%
Price, $
$225.99
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349044 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
30.4590570719603%
Multi-Core
825
11.409210344350711%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |