Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7960X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7960X is 1370 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-7960X - $46.41 vs $357.22
- Up to 87% better value when playing Valheim than Core i9-7960X - $0.24 vs $1.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than Intel Core i9-7960X - 53 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7960X
- Performs up to 5% better in Valheim than Celeron G1820 - 200 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 32 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
190
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349273 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
FPS
200
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.79/FPS
13.40782122905028%
Price, $
$357.22
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for $357.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349274 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
35.68313953488372%
Multi-Core
825
7.8601371951219505%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i9-7960X |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 165 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |