Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2400G is 1534 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 66% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2400G - $46.41 vs $135.0
- Up to 64% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Ryzen 5 2400G - $0.17 vs $0.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 53 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 4% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Celeron G1820 - 286 vs 274 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
274
95.8041958041958%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349274 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
286
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
36.17021276595745%
Price, $
$135
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for $135 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349276 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
46.45222327341533%
Multi-Core
825
25.045537340619305%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |