Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700T is 639 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 54% cheaper than Core i7-6700T - $46.41 vs $99.9
- Up to 50% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-6700T - $0.42 vs $0.84 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Performs up to 7% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G1820 - 119 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Celeron G1820 - 35 vs 53 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 8 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
111
93.27731092436974%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349271 minutes ago
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349272 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
41.50464919695689%
Multi-Core
825
23.13516545148626%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |