Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-8100 is 1404 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i3-8100 - $46.41 vs $110.0
- Up to 56% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i3-8100 - $0.42 vs $0.96 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i3-8100 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 5% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Celeron G1820 - 115 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
110
95.65217391304348%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349267 minutes ago
Buy for $110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349268 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
39.437751004016064%
Multi-Core
825
24.229074889867842%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i3-8100 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |