Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 2662 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - $46.41 vs $270.0
- Up to 71% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-11900 - $0.35 vs $1.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 71% better in War Thunder than Celeron G1820 - 226 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 16 vs 2 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
132
58.4070796460177%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349157 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
226
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.19/FPS
29.411764705882355%
Price, $
$270
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349158 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
23.051643192488264%
Multi-Core
825
9.357985480943737%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |