Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 1405 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 81% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - $39.95 vs $210.0
- Up to 79% better value when playing Valheim than Ryzen 7 3700X - $0.21 vs $1.02 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 7% better in Valheim than Celeron G3900 - 205 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
191
93.17073170731707%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349403 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
205
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.02/FPS
20.588235294117645%
Price, $
$210
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349404 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
35.126964933494556%
Multi-Core
992
12.243890397432732%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Skylake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |