Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700 is 1330 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i7-9700 - $39.95 vs $260.26
- Up to 84% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-9700 - $0.21 vs $1.28 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700
- Performs up to 6% better in Valheim than Celeron G3900 - 203 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
191
94.08866995073892%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349271 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
203
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.28/FPS
16.40625%
Price, $
$260.26
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $260.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349272 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
37.339331619537276%
Multi-Core
992
15.956248994691974%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |