Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700K is 765 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i7-8700K - $39.95 vs $192.0
- Up to 78% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-8700K - $0.31 vs $1.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-8700K - 51 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700K
- Performs up to 7% better in The Last of Us Part I than Celeron G3900 - 137 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
128
93.43065693430657%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349335 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
137
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.4/FPS
22.142857142857146%
Price, $
$192
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $192 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349335 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
36.72566371681416%
Multi-Core
992
15.396554400124165%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |