Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $39.95 vs $198.9
- Up to 78% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-11600K - $0.31 vs $1.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 11% better in The Last of Us Part I than Celeron G3900 - 142 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
128
90.14084507042254%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349342 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
142
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.4/FPS
22.142857142857146%
Price, $
$198.9
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $198.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349343 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
26.578225068618483%
Multi-Core
992
11.563119244667211%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |