Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Celeron G3900 vs Core i5-11600K

Celeron G3900 vs Core i5-11600K: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Intel Celeron G3900

2.8 GHz | 2-core

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz Dual-Core Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 (CM8066201928610)

Buy for $39.95 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 349342 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i5-11600K

3.9 GHz | 6-core

Intel Core i5-11600K Logo
Intel® Core™ i5-11600K Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.9 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 125W

Buy for $198.9 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 349343 minutes ago

Intel Celeron G3900

2.8 GHz | 2-core

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz Dual-Core Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 (CM8066201928610)

Buy for $39.95 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 349342 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i5-11600K

3.9 GHz | 6-core

Intel Core i5-11600K Logo
Intel® Core™ i5-11600K Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.9 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 125W

Buy for $198.9 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 349343 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.

Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900

  • Up to 80% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $39.95 vs $198.9
  • Up to 78% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i5-11600K - $0.31 vs $1.4 per FPS
  • Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 51 vs 125 Watts

Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K

  • Performs up to 11% better in The Last of Us Part I than Celeron G3900 - 142 vs 128 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
This is a free version of The Last of Us Part I.

The Last of Us Part I

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015


FPS

128

90.14084507042254%

Value, $/FPS

$0.31/FPS

100%

Price, $

$39.95

100%

Value Winner

Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz Dual-Core Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 (CM8066201928610)

Buy for $39.95 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 349342 minutes ago

Intel Core i5-11600K Logo
Core i5-11600K

Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021


FPS

142

100%

Value, $/FPS

$1.4/FPS

22.142857142857146%

Price, $

$198.9

20%

FPS Winner

Intel® Core™ i5-11600K Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.9 GHz Unlocked LGA1200 (Intel® 500 Series & Select 400 Series Chipset) 125W

Buy for $198.9 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 349343 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Ultra

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015

Intel Core i5-11600K Logo
Core i5-11600K

Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo
Celeron G3900

Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015


Single-Core

581

26.578225068618483%

Multi-Core

992

11.563119244667211%

Intel Core i5-11600K Logo
Core i5-11600K

Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021


Single-Core

2186

100%

Multi-Core

8579

100%

Intel Celeron G3900 Logo

Intel Celeron G3900

vs
Intel Core i5-11600K Logo

Intel Core i5-11600K

Sep 1st, 2015Release Date
Mar 16th, 2021
CeleronCollectionCore i5
SkylakeCodenameRocket Lake
Intel Socket 1151SocketIntel Socket 1200
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
2Cores
6
2Threads
12
2.8 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.9 GHz
Non-TurboTurbo Clock Speed4.9 GHz
51 W
TDP125 W
14 nmProcess Size14 nm
28.0xMultiplier
39.0x
Intel HD 510Integrated GraphicsUHD Graphics 750
NoOverclockable
Yes

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.