Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 62 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i7-6700 - $39.95 vs $150.0
- Up to 72% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-6700 - $0.31 vs $1.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 5% better in The Last of Us Part I than Celeron G3900 - 134 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
128
95.52238805970148%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349225 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
134
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.12/FPS
27.678571428571423%
Price, $
$150
26%
FPS Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349226 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
44.93426140757927%
Multi-Core
992
23.96135265700483%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |