Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 2583 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - $39.95 vs $297.99
- Up to 85% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-13600K - $0.14 vs $0.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 18% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Celeron G3900 - 327 vs 276 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 20 vs 2 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
276
84.40366972477065%
Value, $/FPS
$0.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349407 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
327
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.91/FPS
15.384615384615385%
Price, $
$297.99
13%
FPS Winner
Buy for $297.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349408 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |