Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 2256 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - $39.95 vs $350.99
- Up to 63% better value when playing Immortals of Aveum than Core i9-12900KF - $1.48 vs $3.99 per FPS
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 51 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 226% better in Immortals of Aveum than Celeron G3900 - 88 vs 27 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
27
30.681818181818183%
Value, $/FPS
$1.48/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349267 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.99/FPS
37.092731829573935%
Price, $
$350.99
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for $350.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349267 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
22.856018882769472%
Multi-Core
992
6.666218668100263%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |