Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900 is 2023 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-11900 - $39.95 vs $270.0
- Up to 83% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-11900 - $0.26 vs $1.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900
- Performs up to 15% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G3900 - 179 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 16 vs 2 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
156
87.15083798882681%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349274 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
179
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.51/FPS
17.218543046357617%
Price, $
$270
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349275 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
27.27699530516432%
Multi-Core
992
11.252268602540836%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |