Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100 is 2317 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i3-12100 - $39.95 vs $116.99
- Up to 57% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i3-12100 - $0.19 vs $0.44 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100 - 51 vs 60 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100
- Performs up to 25% better in Battlefield V than Celeron G3900 - 264 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
211
79.92424242424242%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349228 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
264
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.44/FPS
43.18181818181818%
Price, $
$116.99
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for $116.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349228 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
27.035830618892508%
Multi-Core
992
14.42489457612331%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i3-12100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 60 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |