Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600K is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - $39.95 vs $143.72
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 51 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 3600% better in Cities: Skylines II than Celeron G3900 - 37 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 90% better value when playing Cities: Skylines II than Celeron G3900 - $3.88 vs $39.95 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Cities: Skylines II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
1
2.7027027027027026%
Value, $/FPS
$39.95/FPS
9.712140175219023%
Price, $
$39.95
100%
Buy for $39.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349229 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
37
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.88/FPS
100%
Price, $
$143.72
27%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $143.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349230 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
581
35.042219541616404%
Multi-Core
992
14.507165837964317%
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |