Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 2400G is 405 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 27% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2400G - $98.02 vs $135.0
- Up to 23% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Ryzen 5 2400G - $0.82 vs $1.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 5% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G3930 - 126 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
120
95.23809523809523%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349747 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
126
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.07/FPS
76.63551401869158%
Price, $
$135
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for $135 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 349749 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
57.52128666035951%
Multi-Core
1043
31.663630843958714%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |