Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6900K is 217 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i7-6900K - $98.02 vs $145.0
- Up to 27% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i7-6900K - $0.88 vs $1.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 51 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 7% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G3930 - 120 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 16 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
112
93.33333333333333%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348973 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
120
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.21/FPS
72.72727272727273%
Price, $
$145
67%
FPS Winner
Buy for $145 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348975 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
48.56230031948881%
Multi-Core
1043
14.652992413599325%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |