Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 552 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i7-6700 - $98.02 vs $150.0
- Up to 17% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i7-6700 - $0.72 vs $0.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 26% better in War Thunder than Celeron G3930 - 173 vs 137 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
137
79.1907514450867%
Value, $/FPS
$0.72/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348968 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
173
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
82.75862068965517%
Price, $
$150
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348969 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
47.022428460943544%
Multi-Core
1043
25.193236714975846%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |