Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9400 is 654 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i5-9400 - $98.02 vs $160.91
- Up to 34% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i5-9400 - $0.88 vs $1.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Performs up to 8% better in Elden Ring than Celeron G3930 - 121 vs 112 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 6 vs 2 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
112
92.56198347107438%
Value, $/FPS
$0.88/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.02
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348969 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
121
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.33/FPS
66.16541353383458%
Price, $
$160.91
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for $160.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 348970 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
43.93063583815029%
Multi-Core
1043
21.751824817518248%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |